Reach Best — Redefining College Admissions with AI

Reach Best — Redefining College Admissions with AI

Reach Best — Redefining College Admissions with AI

Case Study · 12 min read

How I Turned College Anxiety Into AI Empathy

How I Turned College Anxiety Into AI Empathy

73% of students feel "completely overwhelmed" by college admissions, yet most tools treat this $2.9B market like a search problem — not an emotional one. When Reach Best's CEO showed me screenshots of students crying in our feedback, I knew we had to redesign how AI talks to stressed teenagers. Four months later, our empathy-first platform was supporting 10,000+ students across 40 countries.

ROLE

Product Designer

TIME

8 Months

TEAM

Ryusei

CEO

Hritik

Full Stack Developer

Soufiane

Frontend Developer

The Turning Point

The Turning Point

Through 45 user interviews, one comment reshaped my perspective:

"Every app gives me the same list of schools, but none of them know that I cry myself to sleep worrying about my future."

This wasn't just user feedback—it was a revelation. The college admissions process isn't just about finding the right school; it's about navigating one of life's most emotionally charged transitions.

This wasn't just user feedback—it was a revelation. The college admissions process isn't just about finding the right school; it's about navigating one of life's most emotionally charged transitions.

This wasn't just user feedback—it was a revelation. The college admissions process isn't just about finding the right school; it's about navigating one of life's most emotionally charged transitions.

Research Methodology

Research Methodology

  • 45 one-on-one user interviews (30 students, 15 counselors)

  • Competitive analysis of 8 major platforms

  • Journey mapping across 6-month application cycles

  • Emotional state tracking through diary studies

  • 45 one-on-one user interviews (30 students, 15 counselors)

  • Competitive analysis of 8 major platforms

  • Journey mapping across 6-month application cycles

  • Emotional state tracking through diary studies

  • 45 one-on-one user interviews (30 students, 15 counselors)

  • Competitive analysis of 8 major platforms

  • Journey mapping across 6-month application cycles

  • Emotional state tracking through diary studies

Understanding the Landscape

Understanding the Landscape

Research

Insights

Archetypes

Prototyping

Testing

Launch

Competitor Analysis

Competitor Analysis

I mapped out the competitive landscape:

  • Naviance → Trusted but outdated; disengaging for students.

  • MaiaLearning → Widely used, but overwhelmingly counselor-focused.

  • Unifrog → Rich database, but complex navigation and poor student engagement.

Opportunity revealed: While competitors offered planning and databases, none addressed the emotional journey of students. They solved for efficiency, but not for empathy.

Opportunity revealed: While competitors offered planning and databases, none addressed the emotional journey of students. They solved for efficiency, but not for empathy.

Opportunity revealed: While competitors offered planning and databases, none addressed the emotional journey of students. They solved for efficiency, but not for empathy.

Research Insights

Research Insights

Key Finding #1: The Emotional Overwhelm

Key Finding #1: The Emotional Overwhelm

  • 45 one-on-one user interviews (30 students, 15 counselors)

  • Competitive analysis of 8 major platforms

  • Journey mapping across 6-month application cycles

  • Emotional state tracking through diary studies

  • 45 one-on-one user interviews (30 students, 15 counselors)

  • Competitive analysis of 8 major platforms

  • Journey mapping across 6-month application cycles

  • Emotional state tracking through diary studies

  • 45 one-on-one user interviews (30 students, 15 counselors)

  • Competitive analysis of 8 major platforms

  • Journey mapping across 6-month application cycles

  • Emotional state tracking through diary studies

Key Finding #2: Information vs. Guidance Gap

Key Finding #2: Information vs. Guidance Gap

  • Students had access to more data than ever before

  • Yet 68% felt they lacked personalized guidance

  • The problem wasn't lack of information—it was lack of emotional support

  • Students had access to more data than ever before

  • Yet 68% felt they lacked personalized guidance

  • The problem wasn't lack of information—it was lack of emotional support

  • Students had access to more data than ever before

  • Yet 68% felt they lacked personalized guidance

  • The problem wasn't lack of information—it was lack of emotional support

Key Finding #3: Counselor Resource Constraints

Key Finding #3: Counselor Resource Constraints

  • Average counselor-to-student ratio: 1:450

  • Counselors spent 60% of time on administrative tasks

  • Limited bandwidth for emotional support and mentoring

  • Average counselor-to-student ratio: 1:450

  • Counselors spent 60% of time on administrative tasks

  • Limited bandwidth for emotional support and mentoring

  • Average counselor-to-student ratio: 1:450

  • Counselors spent 60% of time on administrative tasks

  • Limited bandwidth for emotional support and mentoring

User Personas

User Personas

From my research, I created student personas that reflected not just academic goals but also emotional

Persona 1

Persona 1

Persona 1

The Focused but Overwhelmed Student

The Focused but Overwhelmed Student

The Focused but Overwhelmed Student

Riya Sharma

17F, High School Senior

17F, High School Senior

17F, High School Senior

Goals:

Goals:

Goals:

  • Discover universities that fit her strengths, interests, and ambitions.

  • Get clear guidance on essays, deadlines, and requirements.

  • Stay motivated while reducing stress and confusion.

Challenges:

Challenges:

Challenges:

  • Feels paralyzed by too many options and scattered information.

  • Struggles with anxiety about rejection and self-doubt.

  • Easily overwhelmed by excessive data and conflicting rankings.

  • Limited access to personalized counselor time.

Behaviors:

Behaviors:

Behaviors:

  • Researches online late at night, mostly on mobile.

  • Creates “dream lists” of colleges but struggles to prioritize.

  • Relies on peer reviews and AI tools for instant feedback.

  • Motivated by progress tracking and milestone achievements.

Persona 2

Persona 2

Persona 2

The Supportive but Overloaded Counselor

The Supportive but Overloaded Counselor

The Supportive but Overloaded Counselor

Anil Verma

42M, School Counselor (500+ students)

42M, School Counselor (500+ students)

42M, School Counselor (500+ students)

Goals:

Goals:

Goals:

  • Help students efficiently discover and apply to best-fit universities.

  • Manage and track student applications in one place.

  • Provide data-driven, personalized guidance without burnout.

Challenges:

Challenges:

Challenges:

  • High student-to-counselor ratio leaves little time per student.

  • Overwhelmed by repetitive queries from hundreds of students.

  • Lacks easy-to-use tools to organize and visualize applications.

Behaviors:

Behaviors:

Behaviors:

  • Prefers desktop tools for managing dashboards and data-heavy tasks.

  • Uses mobile notifications only for quick updates.

  • Relies on dashboards that give quick snapshots of student progress.

  • Values AI tools that reduce repetitive tasks and allow deeper mentoring.

These personas became the foundation for testing how empathy-driven AI could respond differently to different emotional patterns.

Design Strategy: Emotion as Differentiator

Design Strategy: Emotion as Differentiator

The Breakthrough Insight

The Breakthrough Insight

I identified recurring emotional patterns and designed AI mentors as archetypes inspired by real student journeys.

I identified recurring emotional patterns and designed AI mentors as archetypes inspired by real student journeys.

Early Validation Testing

Early Validation Testing

In testing with 12 students, 9 preferred personality-driven AI over generic responses. This validated that emotion could be a differentiator.

Test Setup:

  • A/B tested generic AI responses vs. personality-driven responses

  • Measured engagement time, return visits, and emotional feedback

  • Asked students to rate "helpfulness" and "understanding"

Results:

  • 75% preference for personality-driven AI

  • 3x longer engagement sessions

  • 68% reported feeling "understood" vs. 12% for generic responses

Design Philosophy Evolution

  • My hardest design decision: Creating AI personalities that felt authentic without being manipulative.

  • The Challenge: How do you create AI that acknowledges emotional distress without exploiting vulnerability?

  • My solution: AI mentors that validated feelings first, then offered practical next steps—never dismissing emotions or rushing to solutions.

The Pivot: From Therapy Bot to Empathetic Guide

The Pivot: From Therapy Bot to Empathetic Guide

Initial Prototype Failure

My early prototypes came across as “chatbot therapy.” One student said:

"This feels like talking to a guidance counselor robot."

What Went Wrong

  • Over-analysis: AI was dissecting problems instead of acknowledging struggles

  • Clinical tone: Language felt therapeutic rather than peer-supportive

  • Solution-focused: Rushed to advice without emotional validation

The Redesign Process

I realized I was building AI that analyzed problems instead of AI that shared struggles.

Key Insight: Students didn't need therapy—they needed someone who understood their specific journey and could offer contextual guidance.

Design Pivot: shifting from clinical analysis to storytelling and emotional resonance.

Validation of New Direction

Engagement improved dramatically when AI mentors:

  • Validated feelings first ("This process is genuinely overwhelming—you're not alone in feeling this way")

  • Shared contextual understanding ("I remember feeling paralyzed by all the options too")

  • Offered practical next steps ("Let's break this down into one small step you can take today")

Solution Architecture

Solution Architecture

What I owned:

  • All user research and strategy development

  • Persona development and journey mapping

  • Complete UX/UI design process

  • Prototyping and usability testing iterations

  • Full design system architecture (built from scratch, no UI libraries)

  • Cross-platform design consistency (web and mobile)

Technical Constraints I Navigated:

  • AI Response Time: Balanced personality authenticity with sub-2-second response times

  • Scalability: Designed mentor personalities that could handle thousands of concurrent conversations

  • Mobile-First Reality: 67% of usage occurred on mobile devices, primarily late evening

  • Integration Complexity: Worked within existing school systems and data privacy requirements

Core Features: The Empathy-First Platform for students

Core Features: The Empathy-First Platform for students

🤖 AI Mentors: Personality-Driven Guidance

I created scalable story-driven personalities—dozens of them—like Maya the Transfer Student, Alex the STEM Explorer, and Jordan the International Applicant. These AI mentor personalities validated feelings first, then offered practical guidance.

AI Mentors - Chat Interface

Design Process:

  • Character Development: Based each mentor on real student interview patterns

  • Voice & Tone: Created distinct communication styles for different personality types

  • Response Training: Developed conversation flows that acknowledged emotional states

  • Scalability Testing: Ensured personalities remained consistent across thousands of interactions

  • Character Development: Based each mentor on real student interview patterns

  • Voice & Tone: Created distinct communication styles for different personality types

  • Response Training: Developed conversation flows that acknowledged emotional states

  • Scalability Testing: Ensured personalities remained consistent across thousands of interactions

  • Character Development: Based each mentor on real student interview patterns

  • Voice & Tone: Created distinct communication styles for different personality types

  • Response Training: Developed conversation flows that acknowledged emotional states

  • Scalability Testing: Ensured personalities remained consistent across thousands of interactions

Key Innovation:

Instead of generic advice, each mentor offered guidance through the lens of shared experience: "When I was navigating applications as a first-gen student, I felt the same way..."

Engagement Results:

  • Students averaged 18 messages per mentor conversation (vs. 3-4 industry standard)

  • 34% returned within 48 hours for follow-up conversations

  • 72% reported feeling less anxious after mentor interactions (n=643 survey responses

  • Students averaged 18 messages per mentor conversation (vs. 3-4 industry standard)

  • 34% returned within 48 hours for follow-up conversations

  • 72% reported feeling less anxious after mentor interactions (n=643 survey responses

  • Students averaged 18 messages per mentor conversation (vs. 3-4 industry standard)

  • 34% returned within 48 hours for follow-up conversations

  • 72% reported feeling less anxious after mentor interactions (n=643 survey responses

✍️ AI Essay Review: Ownership Over Outsourcing

Feedback system that helped students refine their own essays instead of outsourcing them. (Research showed 84% wanted to "own their stories").

AI Essay

The Ethical Design Challenge:

Biggest influence moment: When stakeholders pushed for AI-written essays, I pushed back. Research showed 84% of students wanted to "own their stories." Instead, I proposed an essay feedback system that guided reflection without replacing student voices. This became one of our strongest differentiators.

How It Worked:

  • Socratic Questioning: AI asked reflective questions rather than providing answers

  • Strength Identification: Highlighted existing strong elements before suggesting improvements

  • Iterative Feedback: Supported multiple revision cycles with evolving guidance

  • Voice Preservation: Ensured feedback enhanced rather than replaced student voice

  • Socratic Questioning: AI asked reflective questions rather than providing answers

  • Strength Identification: Highlighted existing strong elements before suggesting improvements

  • Iterative Feedback: Supported multiple revision cycles with evolving guidance

  • Voice Preservation: Ensured feedback enhanced rather than replaced student voice

  • Socratic Questioning: AI asked reflective questions rather than providing answers

  • Strength Identification: Highlighted existing strong elements before suggesting improvements

  • Iterative Feedback: Supported multiple revision cycles with evolving guidance

  • Voice Preservation: Ensured feedback enhanced rather than replaced student voice

Impact: This ethical stance became a major conversion driver—parents and educators specifically chose us because we supported authentic student expression.

🔍 RB Search: Fit Over Rankings

Goal-based recommendations that curated schools based on fit, not rankings. AI explained why each school matched personal goals and preferences.

RB Search

The Algorithm Innovation:

Instead of ranking-based sorting, I designed a "Fit Score System" that considered:

  • Academic Profile Match: GPA, test scores, course rigor

  • Interest Alignment: Major preferences, career goals, research opportunities

  • Cultural Fit: Campus size, location, social environment preferences

  • Practical Considerations: Financial aid availability, distance from home

User Experience Design:

Instead of ranking-based sorting, I designed a "Fit Score System" that considered:

  • Explanation-First Results: Every recommendation came with clear reasoning

  • Interactive Filtering: Students could adjust preferences and see real-time changes

  • Comparison Tools: Side-by-side analysis of fit factors

  • Save & Organize: Personal lists with notes and deadlines

Technical Challenge: Balancing comprehensive data analysis with simplified decision-making interfaces—making complex algorithms feel intuitive and trustworthy.

📝 Smart Notes: Centralized Knowledge Management

A Medium-style editor for capturing insights, deadlines, and reflections—keeping admissions knowledge in one organized place.

Smart Notes

User Research Insight:

Students were losing critical information across multiple platforms—screenshots in photos, notes in various apps, deadlines on paper calendars. Additionally, they struggled to keep track of valuable resources they discovered while researching universities: helpful tweets from current students, YouTube campus tours, Reddit discussions about specific programs, and TikTok videos about campus life.

Design Solution:

  • Rich Text Editor: Formatting options for different types of content

  • Auto-Tagging: AI suggested relevant tags based on content

  • Deadline Integration: Calendar sync for important dates

  • Search & Filter: Quick retrieval of specific information

  • Sharing Options: Easy collaboration with counselors and parents

Behavioral Impact:

Students reported feeling 65% more organized and 43% less likely to miss deadlines after adopting Smart Notes.

🌍 Campus Exploration: Gamified Research

Integrated Google Earth with game-like controls, turning research into an interactive, tactile experience.

Campus View

The Innovation:

Traditional campus research felt overwhelming—static photos and endless text descriptions. I designed an immersive exploration experience that made discovering schools feel like a journey rather than a chore.

Features:

  • 3D Campus Tours: Google Earth integration with custom waypoints

  • Interactive Hotspots: Click for specific building information, student reviews

  • Comparison Mode: Explore multiple campuses side-by-side

  • Personal Pins: Save favorite locations and add private notes

  • Weather & Seasons: See campuses in different conditions year-round

Engagement Boost:

Average session time increased from 4 minutes to 23 minutes when students used Campus Exploration vs. traditional search results.

Counselor Experience: Proactive Support Tools

Counselor Experience: Proactive Support Tools

📊 Progress Dashboard: Real-Time Student Visibility

Real-time visibility into each student's journey, including:

  • Which universities they applied to

  • Whether essays were submitted

  • If recommendation letters were uploaded

This gave counselors a clear picture of student progress without chasing updates over email.

Counselor Students View

Counselor Students View

Impact on Counselor Workflow:

  • 73% reduction in administrative email exchanges

  • 45% increase in time available for one-on-one student mentoring

  • 89% of counselors reported feeling more connected to student progress

📈 Aggregate Insights: Data-Driven Decision Making

Trends across the entire student body, such as how many applied to a specific university or country. This helped counselors benchmark outcomes, allocate time, and prepare resources for the most popular destinations.

Counselor Analytics

Analytics Features:

  • Application Patterns: Most popular schools, programs, geographic preferences

  • Timeline Analysis: When students typically complete different milestones

  • Success Metrics: Acceptance rates, scholarship awards, enrollment decisions

  • Resource Planning: Predict workshop needs, counselor availability, deadline rushes

Strategic Value:

Counselors could proactively plan resources—if they saw 40% of students interested in engineering programs, they could schedule targeted workshops or bring in specific guest speakers.

🎯 Smart Filters: Focused Intervention

A quick way to surface disengaged or at-risk students, so counselors could focus their limited time where it mattered most.

Student levels

Risk Detection Algorithm:

  • Engagement Metrics: Login frequency, feature usage, response times

  • Progress Indicators: Missed deadlines, incomplete applications, stalled essays

  • Communication Patterns: Reduced interaction with AI mentors, declined help offers

  • Behavioral Changes: Sudden drops in platform usage or engagement quality

Counselor Interface:

  • Priority Queue: Students ranked by intervention urgency

  • Context Cards: Quick background on each student's situation

  • Suggested Actions: AI-recommended intervention strategies

  • Follow-up Tracking: Monitor effectiveness of outreach efforts

Result: Counselors could identify and support struggling students 3-4 weeks earlier than traditional methods, leading to better outcomes and reduced crisis interventions.

Results & Impact

Results & Impact

Business Metrics

Business Metrics

  • Multiple schools became paying customers within 6 months

  • Ethical positioning improved conversion rates significantly

  • Organic adoption reduced reliance on marketing spend

User Engagement & Satisfaction

User Engagement & Satisfaction

  • 10,000+ students across 40+ countries using the platform

  • Students averaged 18 messages per mentor conversation (internal analytics)

  • In post-conversation surveys (n=643), 72% reported feeling less anxious

  • 34% returned within 48 hours (Hotjar analytics)

Platform Growth & Recognition

Platform Growth & Recognition

  • 5M+ reach across TikTok and Instagram through organic user sharing

  • Invited to present at the Council of International Schools (only 2nd company after Duolingo)

  • Positive feedback from educators highlighted our ethical design stance

  • Featured in Mexican news channel and San Francisco Chronicle for our empathetic AI approach

Counselor Efficiency Gains

Counselor Efficiency Gains

  • 73% reduction in administrative email exchanges

  • 45% increase in one-on-one mentoring time availability

  • 89% of counselors reported feeling more connected to student progress

  • Early intervention improved by 3-4 weeks on average

Personal Growth & Key Learnings

Personal Growth & Key Learnings

From Solo Designer to Systems Thinker and Story Architect

WHAT I LEARNED:

Empathy > Algorithms

Even the smartest tools fall flat if they don't feel human. Empathy drove more impact than algorithms ever could

Even the smartest tools fall flat if they don't feel human. Empathy drove more impact than algorithms ever could

Even the smartest tools fall flat if they don't feel human. Empathy drove more impact than algorithms ever could

Systems Thinking Through Constraints

With no UI kits or libraries, I was forced to think in systems and build a lean, scalable design language from the ground up. This constraint became a strength—every element was intentionally designed for our specific use case.

Ethical Design as Competitive Advantage

By choosing not to let AI write essays, we ended up building tools that supported deep thinking—and earned lasting trust. This ethical stance became our strongest differentiator.

Technical Constraints Breed Innovation

Working within school system limitations and mobile-first usage patterns forced creative solutions that became our most beloved features.

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.